American historian Francis Parkman first advanced this theory and wrote, It is easy to decide the nature of the education, past and present, which wrought on the Canadians and made them what they were. An unknowledgeable population, sprung from a brave and active race, but trained to loyalty and dependence through centuries of feudal and monarchical despotism was deep-rooted in the wilderness by the hand of authority and told to enkindle and flourish. Artificial stimulants were applied, but freedom was withheld. Perpetual intervention of government,--regulations, restrictions, encouragements sometimes more mischievous than restrictions, a constant uncertainty what the political science would do next, the fate of each man resting less with himself than with another, willing enfeebled, self-reliance paralyzed, - the condition, in short of a child held invariably under the rule of a father in the chief(prenominal) well-meant and kind, sometimes generous and sometimes neglectful, often capricious, and elevated very wise, - such were the influence under which Canada grew up.
If she had prospered it would have been trim miracle. A man, to be a man, must feel that he holds his fate, in some good measure, in his own hands... In the building up of the colonies, England succeeded and France failed. The cause lies chiefly in the enormous advantage drawn by England from the historical training of her mess in habits of reflection, forecast, industry and self-reliance - a training which enabled them to draw and maintain an invigorating system of self-rule, totally inapplicable to their rivals. composition New England prospered and Canada did not prosper, the French system had one great(p) advantage. It favoured military efficiency. The Canadian population sprang in...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment