According to the one-fifth Amendment, when there is a trial by jury, entirely twelve jury members must determine a unanimous vote on whether the defendant is innocent or guilty. 12 Angry Men demonstrates how one earthly concern keister go against the popular vote by voting the 18 year one-time(a) boy innocent while all the others are convinced otherwise and believe he is guilty. The man who voted him innocent thence tries to persuade the others, over a compeer of hours, then eventually influences more and more of the twelve men to believe the eighteen year obsolescent is innocent.
Also, in the Fifth Amendment, it states that people have the even bulge to be a aver or to not be a witness against themselves. In the movie, a lady who lives nearby and an old man who lives cut out the hall of the defendants home, testify as witnesses against the eighteen year old and try to prove the he committed murder. The lady who lives crosswise the street claims to have seen through the window of a short-lived train in the middle of the night that the boy stabbed his father.

The old man states he heard the boy yell Im going to kill you, some arguing then the sound of a body hitting the floor right before he saw the kid run out. both(prenominal) witnesses stories have some faults to them. For instance, the lady stretch forths glasses and in place for her to see the whole incident at night, she would have had to wear her glasses to bed the night it happened. The old man swore he substantially saw the boy run out of the building, solely for him to do so he would have had to jump out of bed and run down the hall in the 15-seconds he said it took him; and with a bad leg it is physically undoable as proven by a jury member.
The ordinal amendment...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment