Personality Type Assessment

Personality Type Assessment (Week-2 Individual Assignment) CMGT/530 IT organisational Behavior July 1, 2012 Personality Type Assessment The first section of this report details the elements that a constitution geek sagacity typically measures. The molybdenum section contains discussion on the personality lawsuit assessment of the reason of this paper. In the third and last section, the author sh bes how his personal assessment outcomes could come upon his work relationships with his colleagues. Elements of Personality Type AssessmentA personality profile assessment is typically an objective test where an respective(prenominal) gives yes or no responses to a series of systematic and deeply constructed behavioral and situational questions. These objective questions at a complete level assesses the individuals cognitive noetic process and orientations and based on the responses classifies the individual into one of the several personality types. Each of these personality t ypes is associated with different delineates of mathematical behaviors and tendencies that the individuals are most likely to exhibit.This classification of personality types is by a personality inventory framework called the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), created by Isabel Briggs Myers after(prenominal) extensive testing and research on the theory of psychological types introduced in the 1920s by Carl G. Jung. At the basic level, the MBTI differentiates nations cognitive functions in tetrad ways, as defined by four mutually exclusive checks of the goerning or likely rational preferences, and the combinations of these four pairs lead to a set of 16 personality types (MBTItoday. rg, n. d. ). The first pair of preferences, extroversion (E) and introversion (I), is for mental energy orientation. The extroverted individuals are expressive, assertive, outgoing, sociable, and draw their mental energy from the interactions with the removed existence. The introverted individu als are reflective, reserved, quiet, and draw their mental energy from the d intumesceing in the inner orbit of thoughts and ideas (Center for Applications of Psychological Type, 2012).The second pair of preferences, sensing(S) and intuition (N), is for unreasonable mental cognitive process related to perceptual experience and receipt of information. The individuals with overabundant sensing perception live in the present moment and are practical. They prefer simplicity, clarity, routine, and order in their daily lives. The individuals with dominant intuition perception are inspired by creativity and innovation, and imagine the possibilities for future. They are cadaverous to the big picture and abstract theoretical concepts (Center for Applications of Psychological Type, 2012).The third pair of preferences, thinking (T) and feeling (F), is for rational mental cognitive processes of forming judgments and making decisions. The individuals who primarily commit on their thinking for forming judgments are objective, analytical, and logical. They use logic, reason, and cause-effect analysis to dole out any problems and tasks they face for achieving results. The individuals who primarily rely on their feelings for forming judgments rely on their personal emotions and value system.They are concerned about impact of their actions and decisions on other people (Center for Applications of Psychological Type, 2012). The fourth pair of preferences, judging (J) and perceiving (P), is for mental orientation while dealing with outside world. The individuals who prefer judging rely on the rational cognitive functions of thinking or feeling. They prefer the world around them to be structured, organized, and orderly. The individuals who prefer perceiving rely on the irrational cognitive functions of sensing and intuition.They typically are open, spontaneous, and flexible and look forward to experiencing the world in its natural state (Center for Applications of Psycholog ical Type, 2012). Personality Type Self-Assessment The generator used Jung typology test to complete the self assessment of his personal panache and the results indicated that the writer belongs to personality type ISFP that means the writer prefers introversion over extroversion, sensing over intuition, feeling over thinking, and perceiving over judging (HumanMetrics, 2012).The writer found himself taking the assessment test few more quantify to confirm the derived results. According to personality inventory of MBTI and the Myers and Briggs Foundation (n. d. ), the individuals with personality type of ISFP have tendency to seek a peaceful, easygoing life with a live and let live philosophy. They tend to enjoy life as it comes and define their own pace. They tend to be quiet, caring, considerate, and have a kind demeanor. They tend to be very devoted to their family and friends, and have a tight set of values that they cherish.They tend to dislike conflicts, disagreements, and imposing of their opinions on others (Myers and Briggs Foundation, n. d. a). by and by looking at the results, the writer understood some of his own tendencies and consoled himself that he did not have to nifty at to each onething. He opined that the knowledge of these personality types can help in developing a deeper understanding of people around him. similarly while taking the assessment, for some of the questions the writer was obligate to choose yes or no when he believed the answer was neither, and there were no in-between options to choose from.So the writer agrees with Robbins & Judge (2011) that the problem with these assessment tests is that they repulse a person into one type or another. According to Mccaulley (1990) every person uses all eight processes (E, I, S, N, T, F, J, and P) but intrinsically prefers one of each opposite pair. In the normal course of life, people develop preferences by doing what comes most naturally. As they grow older and wiser, they deve lop as well as use more of the lesser preferred processes (Mccaulley, 1990).Reflecting back on his life, the writer agrees the personality type ISFP correctly indicates his default tendencies. Moreover, the writer to a fault believes that over the years he has developed more shades to his personality and has become more balanced. Effect of Personal Assessment The assessment provided an opportunity for the writer to do some self-introspection and become more aware of self. Also the knowledge and understanding of 16 distinctive personality types helped the writer to jimmy others possessing different personality types.When employees can understand their type preferences, they can court their work in a manner that ruff suits their style, including managing their time, problem solving, best approaches to decision making, and dealing with stress (Myers and Briggs Foundation, n. d. b) . The writer could analyze better the good and not-so-good relations he has experienced with his prior bosses and colleagues. The personality type assessment also helped the writer to reexamine his behavior with prior colleagues and identify the place setting for improving relationships with his colleagues at the workplace.As a software development manager in a leading health care organization, the writer will exercise use of the new understanding of his own personality to improve upon his managerial functions and his handling of the different situations. These functions includes managing others, developing leadership skills, organizing tasks, creating teams, training for management as well as staff, conflict resolution, motivation, coaching, diversity, recognition as well as rewards, and change management (Myers and Briggs Foundation, n. d. b) . References Center for Applications of Psychological Type. 2012). Mbti overview. Retrieved from http//www. capt. org/mbti-assessment/mbti-overview. htm HumanMetrics. (2012). Jung typology test. Retrieved from http//www. humanmetrics. com/c gi-win/jtypes1. htm MBTItoday. org. (n. d. ). History of the myers briggs type indicator. Retrieved from http//mbtitoday. org/about-the-mbti-indicator/a-mini-history-of-the-myers-briggs-type-indicator/ Mccaulley, M. H. (1990). The myers-briggs type indicator a measure for individuals.. Measurement & Evaluation In instruction & Development (American Counseling Association), 22(4), 181.Retrieved from https//search. ebscohost. com/login. aspx? direct=true&db=f5h&AN=9705111082&site=eds-live Myers and Briggs Foundation. (n. d a). The 16 mbti types. Retrieved from http//www. myersbriggs. org/my-mbti-personality-type/mbti-basics/the-16-mbti-types. aspISFP Myers and Briggs Foundation. (n. d. b). Mbti type at work. Retrieved from http//www. myersbriggs. org/type-use-for-everyday-life/mbti-type-at-work/ Robbins, S. P. , & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organization behavior (14th ed. ). forward-looking York, NY Prentice Hall.