More m cardinaly and much t severallyers atomic number 18 nonhing more than self-serving strategies to enhance the wealth and power of the education establishment. This inverted comma by Walter Williams, from his article, More Money, Better Education? is one that I couldnt agree with more. Williams article is very persuasive, as he uses impelling data to prove his point. While in his article rude(a) Schools Now, Jesse Jackson brings up legitimate counter arguments as to wherefore improving our inner city schools is so important, but does not come across as very convincing. As a recent high school graduate, and a current college student, my scene of the American education system is very strong. Simply with child(p) more money to schools will not solve the Americas educational tribulations; more blame must be put on the students and parents.
In his article Jessie Jackson tires to persuade the reader into thinking that more money will solve the educational crisis. Jackson tires to raise over his audience by using a freaky statistic that shouldnt purge apply to the topic. Jackson explains, Chicago spends an average of $18,615 a year on each inmate, compared with an average of $6,941 on each public school student.(Jackson 188). How can these two differing numbers even be compared? An inmate receives housing, food, health care, and spends the whole year at the jail.
I believe it is very fair to spend one third of that on a student, who does not need 3 meals a day, overnight housing, and health care. It is evident that Mr. Jackson has not properly examined the data. After reading Walter Williams article, I was convinced that Jessie Jacksons beliefs are false. When the facts are examined, the numbers tell the whole story. New jersey spends $10,900 per student, this makes them number one in expenditures per student...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment